HOME


History


NewsoftheIrish


Book Reviews
& Book Forum


Search / Archive
Back to 10/96

Papers


Reference


About


Contact



ireland, irish, ulster, ireland, irish, ulster, Sinn Féin, Irish America

The real humiliation

(by Suzanne Breen, the News Letter)

It's yet more lies and spinning from the Provos. Publishing photographs of IRA decommissioning equals humiliation so all republicans and nationalists should be against it.

Yet that's not the case. Most unionists don't concern themselves with the sensitivities of the IRA and its supporters but, even from a republican viewpoint, it's difficult to defend the objection to pictures.

For the republican base, opposing decommissioning itself is completely logical. IRA weapons were bought to oppose British rule in Northern Ireland and the British remain here so the weapons should stay as long as they do, it's claimed.

But once the principle of decommissioning has been conceded, that argument falls. It's the decommissioning that could be construed as humiliating, not the publicity about it.

If your behaviour is publicised, you are only humiliated if it's something you are ashamed of. If you are proud of or at ease with what you've done, you won't care who knows about it.

It's the cheats, the fakes, and the liars who fear transparency. There is no reason for ordinary IRA members themselves to oppose photographs. It will let them see with their own eyes exactly what is being done in their name.

They are the people who raised money for the guns, hid the guns, and used the guns. Surely, they would want to see what happens the guns rather than take the word of a Sinn Féin suit?

Why should any political or military organisation be humiliated by the light being shone on something it has agreed to? Doesn't it have the courage of its convictions to stand its ground and defend its position?

The Rev Ian Paisley went to Dublin in September. He didn't sneak in by the back door. He faced the cameras. He believed what he was doing was consistent with his principles and he told the media so.

The Provo leadership is camera-shy because it knows decommissioning isn't in keeping with its traditional beliefs. By the standards of republican orthodoxy, it's an immoral act.

It's akin to the Pope being pictured leaving a brothel. Followers will have difficulty keeping faith afterwards. The Provos are surely looking for a way out of the mess.

The governments probably reckoned that publishing their proposals last week improved the chances of bridging the gap between Sinn Féin and the DUP. The opposite has been the case.

The DUP won't budge from its demand for pictures so Sinn Féin will have to be imaginative. The Provos might well consider going ahead with decommissioning anyway and presenting the DUP with a fait accompli minus the photos.

Unionists would still be immensely suspicious of the process but a huge chunk of international opinion would be satisfied. Sinn Féin would then demand devolution be restored. It would denounce the DUP as the party which can never be pleased if it opposed the move.

An unfortunate element in this whole scenario would be that the plain people of Northern Ireland - unionist and republican - would be completely in the dark as to what exactly happened in a Border bog with Gen de Chastelain. And that isn't healthy in any democracy.

December 16, 2004
________________

This article appears in the December 16, 2004 edition of the News Letter.

BACK TO TOP


About
Home
History
NewsoftheIrish
Books
Contact