HOME


History


NewsoftheIrish


Book Reviews
& Book Forum


Search / Archive
Back to 10/96

Papers


Reference


About


Contact



ireland, irish, ulster, ireland, irish, ulster, Sinn Fein, Irish America

The men behind wee Jeffrey

(by Suzanne Breen, the News Letter)

For a small man, Jeffrey Donaldson can create a huge amount of trouble. All those stormy Ulster Unionist executive meetings. The endless UUC Saturday morning gatherings when Fermanagh farmers would have preferred to stay in their fields and the rest of us in our beds.

Now, they're over, and the party can return to being as boring as it was before. The UUP does boring very well - although the SDLP still manages to do it better.

The grey men in grey suits will once again be uninterrupted at the annual conference. Polite applause will emanate from those delegates who have remained awake.

For decades, the UUP and the SDLP were the smug constitutionals. They grew fat and lazy. "Vote for us because we're a nice middle-class bunch who don't murder people," was effectively the SDLP mantra.

Forget about building a future leadership or grassroots organisation. Local people knew an election was approaching when SDLP advice centres finally opened.

The party's response to the Sinn Féin challenge showed its bourgeois ineptitude.

It opted for gimmicks, internal reviews, and even more professional advisers. The result was disastrous. The SDLP is now effectively finished which isn't good for democracy within nationalism.

The UUP's crisis isn't so extreme but it's still significant. Donaldson's defection makes the DUP the largest unionist party at Westminster.

In the Assembly, it has 33 seats to the UUP's 24. But there's more to this than numbers. The DUP is now a mainstream party.

Donaldson is the epitome of the traditional, middle-of-the-road unionist. He isn't the type to march up mountains or lambast line-dancing. If the DUP can attract him, it can appeal to virtually any unionist. Donaldson's defection also strengthens the modernising elements in a party moving from the far- to centre-right.

Although some fundamentals remain. A social function in Sixmilecross welcomed Arlene Foster and others into their new party. "We're having cocktails," confided a guest. But it's still the sausage-on-the-stick - not the vodka martini variety - at DUP hooleys.

Politically, the DUP has room to manoeuvre. Like Sinn Féin, it faces no militant opposition from within its own community. Dissident republicans have failed to mount a political challenge to Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness.

Bob McCartney's UK Unionist Party, which might have been a threat to the DUP, is a shadow of its former self. But despite the DUP's softer language and image, it's firmly anti-Agreement.

So are a significant majority of unionists. David Trimble's problem was really never Jeffrey Donaldson - it was what and whom he represented. The UUP isn't alone in refusing to face reality.

Both governments seem to wish the DUP and its voters would simply "wise up" and accept the Agreement. We keep hearing how 70% of the population is pro-Agreement.

That's true. But the unfortunate reality for the Agreement's architects is that THEY instigated a system which requires the support of a majority in both communities.

Bertie Ahern is foolish to suggest even considering a change of the Stormont rules. That would totally undermine the Agreement's credibility.

Sooner or later, there must be serious political engagement with the DUP. Insisting no alternative exists to the Agreement isn't enough. Community groups and professional organisations might revere the devolved institutions but there isn't the same affection among ordinary citizens.

Just how upset would the majority of unionists be with Direct Rule continuing, even with a dollop of Dublin interference? Most would prefer it to Martin McGuinness running their schools.

And that's the dilemma for the governments. What to do about those who don't believe a deal with Sinn Féin is better than no deal at all.

January 8, 2004
________________

This article appears in the January 8, 2004 edition of the News Letter.

BACK TO TOP


About
Home
History
NewsoftheIrish
Books
Contact