Loyalist disaffection with the peace process is nothing new, but the UVF's suspension of contact with General de Chastelain must be regarded as a worrying step in the wrong direction.
The move followed a downbeat statement from the UVF and Red Hand Commando warning that their commitment to the process was wavering and blaming the IRA for their lack of confidence.
The UVF accused republicans of "the wholesale targeting of the pro-union population" and said its commitment to the process "faces adverse strain."
This strain was apparent last week when the PUP withdrew from the current round of talks aimed at restoring devolved powers.
Any moves which take us backwards must be regarded with concern, particularly, when those making negative noises are well-armed paramilitary groups.
While there has been understandable alarm at republican intelligence gathering, it has to be pointed out that allegations of targeting are also being levelled at loyalists.
All such activity by republicans is wrong, but there appears to be a lack of recognition of loyalist wrongdoing.
In recent years, loyalists have been responsible for a greater level of violence than republicans, yet this fact is largely glossed over by unionists.
In particular, the UVF has been involved in murder, gun attacks and an attempt to bomb the Auld Lammas Fair.
Last September two men were jailed for 11 years for conspiring to send five kilos of explosives from Scotland to Northern Ireland.
It could be argued that these acts undermine confidence in the UVF's intent towards nationalists.
Nevertheless, the PUP's positive contribution to the peace process must be recognised and there will be some sympathy for their belief that they have been excluded from meaningful negotiations.
Inclusivity is an essential component of any talks, and it is important that the views of the smaller parties are taken on board.
However, it is difficult to see how disengagement will build the trust and confidence needed in the current political situation.
